A self-assessment questionnaire and attention tests, such as the Stroop test, can show whether a person has been abducted by aliens.
No evidence
These tests measure traits, not events.
No test has been shown to detect an abduction. Questionnaires and attention tests can show how a person thinks and remembers, and abduction reports go with some traits such as vivid imagination. They cannot show what happened to the person.
Last reviewed: 15 November 20265 sourcesVersion 1.0
Short answer
Some groups offer self-assessment questionnaires and use attention tests such as the Stroop test to decide who is an “abductee”. The Stroop test, published in 1935, measures how much a person's attention is disturbed when a colour word is printed in a different ink [1]. It was designed to study attention, not to detect events. Researchers who compared people reporting abductions with other groups found differences in traits, such as a tendency to absorb into fantasy and to form false memories [2]. Those differences describe the person. They do not show that an abduction happened. We found no study showing that any test can tell a real abduction from a vivid sleep experience [5].
What supporters can show
Verified
Groups of people reporting abductions do differ on tests
Source
Clancy and colleagues (2002) compared people reporting abductions with other groups. The abduction group scored higher on some measures of imaginative absorption and unusual beliefs, and made more errors on a word-list test of false memory [2].
Shows
Tests can pick up traits that go with reporting abductions.
Does not show
That a test can show whether an abduction happened. A trait is not an event [2].
Verified
The Stroop test is well known and reliable
Source
The Stroop test shows reliably that naming the ink colour of a word is slower when the word names a different colour [1].
Shows
It is a respected tool for studying attention.
Does not show
That it detects abduction. It was built to study attention, and nothing in it relates to alien contact [1].
Partly verified
People say the results describe them accurately
Source
People who take self-assessment tests and receive a personal result often feel that it describes them accurately [3].
Shows
Personalised results feel convincing.
Does not show
That the results are accurate. In Forer's classroom demonstration every student received the same text and rated it highly accurate for themselves [3].
Could not verify
Claims that supporters often repeat and that we looked for but could not confirm in a reliable source.
Published validation. Groups that use these tests say they distinguish abductees from other people. We found no peer-reviewed validation study of any such test.
Scores that “separate” groups. We could not find the data behind claims that a particular score identifies abductees, or any description of the comparison group.
What science found
A test must be checked against a known answer
To show that a test detects abductions, researchers would need a group of people known to have been abducted and a group known not to have been, and would then show that the test separates them. No such group has ever been identified, so the test cannot be checked [5].
Personal results feel accurate even when they are generic
In 1949 the psychologist Bertram Forer gave his students a personality test and then handed each of them the same text as their “result”. They rated it highly accurate for themselves [3]. A questionnaire that tells you that you may be an abductee works the same way if it matches common experiences, such as vivid dreams or night waking.
The Stroop test measures attention
In a Stroop test, people name the ink colour of words that spell other colours, for example the word red printed in blue. The test measures how much automatic reading interferes with naming colours [1]. It is used to study attention. It says nothing about what happened to a person in the past.
Traits explain the reports without an event
Studies find that people reporting abductions are more likely to have had sleep paralysis, to be prone to fantasy and to form false memories [2][4]. These traits make such experiences more likely and the memories more convincing. They explain why a test can separate the groups without any abduction taking place.
What is still open
Whether a questionnaire could reliably identify people who have intense, frightening sleep experiences, and so help them find support, is a fair research question [4]. A test that detects abduction events is not.
If this happens to you
If a test says that you may be an “abductee”, treat it as a questionnaire result, not a diagnosis. If you have frightening experiences at night, a doctor or sleep specialist can help [4]. Be careful with any group that asks for money or promises to remove the “problem”.
Sources
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662.
Clancy, S. A., McNally, R. J., Schacter, D. L., Lenzenweger, M. F., & Pitman, R. K. (2002). Memory distortion in people reporting abduction by aliens. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(3), 455–461.
Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(1), 118–123.
McNally, R. J., & Clancy, S. A. (2005). Sleep paralysis, sexual abuse, and space alien abduction. Transcultural Psychiatry, 42(1), 113–122.
Clancy, S. A. (2005). Abducted: How People Come to Believe They Were Kidnapped by Aliens. Harvard University Press.
Change log
15 November 2026: First publication. Verdict: No evidence.